> Come to think of it maybe we don't *need* the various test org > "sections" if we maintain the notion of GNUmed "profiles"... under > such an approach, we could construct our choice of broad and narrow > profiles in > > clin.test_type_unified ... > A broader collecting term could be "micro" > > A more-clinically-oriented example might be > > diab > > which might gather together not only the glucose values but HbA1c, > renal / albuminuric and lipid values > > Sound right? I almost agree. There's value in keeping separate
profile under which we group values to be displayed *together* unified type under which we group values to be display *as one type* panel grouping of which HL7 seems to require and which documents how tests were ordered and values returned -- regardless of how an individual user thinks they want to group tests into profiles Those three have semantic difference of clinical value. Karsten -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
