-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>> - would the checkbox "Technically abnormal" within the Review widget >> serve to let the user overwrite (alter) whatever value had been provided >> by test_org? > No way ! :-) What the test_org thinks is what they think. > GNUmed wouldn't dare alter that even if a misguided user > thinks that'd be a good idea. A user review attaches to a > certain result (or document) what that user thinks about it. > One limitation (which seems logical to me): There can only > be one review per result per user (which can be altered, of > course). Our lab reports results with a _reference range_ rather than making a statement about normality. 1 in 20 results will be expected to be outside the reference range without indicating pathology. I frequently mark a group of results - liver function tests for instance - - as normal despite one of them being outside the reference range. SOme patients have a congenitally different result on some measurement from the general run, a large but trivial example is those with GIlbert's syndrome having a higher bilirubin. Possibly the concept we are dealing with is less "normality" and more "remarkability". - -- A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH73nrb80am9d/StcRAqiHAJ9qAw0J1cvG+l7YkiycjninaU28KACgmyV3 uLjS5CoQD0qzP/cMeVQA/uo= =FX/+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnumed-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
