Yeah - it is a must have, but an intrusive implementation would be needed.

First step would be an acknowledgment  from the developers that this is 
a feature worth implementing. Any patch that attempts to make it work is 
going to touch a lot of things.

John Leonard wrote:
> Hi Andrea
>
> This is a known bug.
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315853
> The bug was posted in 2005. Not sure if anyone is actively trying to 
> fix it, but it would be a big step forward if someone could. I would 
> agree it is a pretty serious limitation to an otherwise commendable 
> bit of software.
>
> John Leonard
>
>
>
> */[EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
>
>     Send gnumeric-list mailing list submissions to
>     [email protected]
>
>     To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
>     or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>     You can reach the person managing the list at
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>     When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>     than "Re: Contents of gnumeric-list digest..."
>
>
>     Today's Topics:
>
>     1. filtering and copying in gnumeric (Andrea Taroni)
>
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Message: 1
>     Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:30:11 +0200
>     From: Andrea Taroni
>     Subject: filtering and copying in gnumeric
>     To: [email protected]
>     Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
>     Dear All,
>
>     I am looking for a way to easily copy and paste filtered data in
>     gnumeric. That is to say I wish to filter a data set, copy the
>     resulting smaller data set, and paste it elsewhere. Whereas I would
>     like to get only the filtered data when I paste, I in fact get the
>     full data set. I cannot find documentation on this issue, except
>     for a
>     message on this list a while ago, which went unreplied:
>
>     http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnumeric-list/2005-September/msg00080.html
>
>     I would like to stress that I am very much a proponent of gnumeric,
>     and prefer it to the very cumbersome alternatives there are out
>     there.
>     This does however seem to me to be a rather basic limitation of
>     gnumeric.
>
>     I would appreciate any help you may give,
>
>     Andrea
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     gnumeric-list mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
>
>
>     End of gnumeric-list Digest, Vol 49, Issue 2
>     ********************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try 
> it now. 
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ%20>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnumeric-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
>   

_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list

Reply via email to