It would make sense to first verify that LOGNORMAL does what it is supposed to do, i.e., what it does for Excel. It is well known that arguments to Excel's statistical functions can be illogical or worse. Nevertheless, changing the semantics away from Excel's is only going to make things worse.
If you need consistency, use the "R" functions: R.DLNORM, R.PLNORM, and R.QLNORM. Morten _______________________________________________ gnumeric-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
