On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Andreas Guelzow wrote: > Hi Allin, > > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 20:23 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote: > > > In working on the file I noticed a rapid degradation in > > performance as the edits proceeded [...] > > > > This was with gnumeric 1.10.14, compiled with gcc 4.6.0, on Linux > > 2.6.38.4, glibc 2.13, GTK 2.24.4. I'd be happy to provide any > > potentially useful diagnostics if anyone can tell me what might be > > needed. > > Is this the 1.10.14 release version or taken from git prior of the > release? (There have been quite a few changes affecting xlsx import in > the 1.10.14 release. So it would be nice to know whether they are in > your version.)
I built gnumeric from the release tarball, dowloaded March 29. > Do you also observe this performance hit if you disable automatic > recalculation? I've now tried that and it didn't seem to make much difference. > Personally I suspect that in the xlsx import the style structure that is > usually optimized in Gnumeric is created without that optimization. > > It would be great if you could file this issue in bugzilla and if you > could attach a sample file that shows this performance hit. OK, thanks. I've created Bug 648868 with a test file. Allin Cottrell _______________________________________________ gnumeric-list mailing list gnumeric-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
