Le samedi 13 août 2011 à 09:14 +0100, Oliver Burnett-Hall a écrit : > On 12 August 2011 14:43, Jean Brefort <jean.bref...@normalesup.org> wrote: > > > > We have several options: > > > > 1. don't display the series in the legend when it's name is actually an > > error message such as "#N/A"; > > I can see this being useful -- you would be able to create a chart > with several series and toggle the visibility of different series by > using a formula for the cell with the series name, and having this > toggle between #N/A! and the series title depending on other cells' > values. > > > 2. don't display the series if all it's data are error values, even if > > it's name is valid. > > IMHO this would be a bad idea, using error values for data values > makes it easy to have null data points and even null data series; this > could make the series vanish entirely. > > > 3. don't display the series when the series has no valid data. > > What's the difference between this and option 2? For 3 do you mean no > valid data AND an invalid series name?
No, that would be if there is nothing to draw (might be empty cells instead of errors). > 4. always display the series, and rely on the user to uncheck the "Show > > in Legend" box if he does not want to see it in the legend. > > This is simple and I don't think there is much wrong with it. This is the current situation. What I'd like to avoid is implement option 1 and get a bug report from somebody who would like (or need) seeing error values in the legend. Jean _______________________________________________ gnumeric-list mailing list gnumeric-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
