The problem is known. Stuffing two values into a string like this never
was a good idea, but we're stuck with it.
The proper precision to use is the one used by the xml format:
l10 = gnm_log10 (FLT_RADIX);
res->output.decimal_digits = (int)gnm_ceil (GNM_MANT_DIG * l10) +
(l10 == (int)l10 ? 0 : 1);
But using this is not without problems: in a lot of cases you get numbers of
the form 0.1000...0001 even when 0.1 would produce the same value.[*]
I think should define that a NULL format given to complex_to_string should
mean that enough precision should be used to round-trip the values.
Morten
[*] And once that is said, one really has to start worrying over
whether the C library
does the closest-representable-value rounding or just whatever the C standard
allows.
_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
gnumeric-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
