On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:39:00AM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: > I was one of the people who opposed a DB backend. I would not at this > time be opposed to an SQLite backend. I would definitely welcome the > benefits you listed!
:) > One of my issues has been that it is difficult (for > me) to customize the look. Lot's of pieces in different locations that > have to be modified in sync today (I use v2.9.7). True. That would be a big step forward. I'd expect each page to have its own template and each *plugin* to also have its own template. Then I would absolutely forbid the use of literal HTML in any of the scripts/plugins. That way things would only ever need to be changed in the templates. > So, I'm supportive of > a 3.0 w/ SQLite, HTML::Template, etc. (Although it would be nice to drop > the "mp3" out of the name since it is too specific to one format.) > -RPM Changing names is hard, but I guess a new accronym could be constructed and the 3 would be for v3 ;) Steve -- _______________________________________________ Gnump3d-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnump3d-users
