On 06/03/15 07:48, Christian Grothoff wrote: > It would be difficult, as for good technical reasons various layers of > the stack have timeouts (to avoid keeping state for too long) that are > incompatible with typical DTN requirements. That said, Jeff did > recently stress the need for (transparent) asynchronous operations for > higher layers of the stack, so maybe future iterations of (for example) > PSYC(2) could be made to work over certain types of DTNs. where can I read Jeff's comments?
> > On 03/05/2015 10:03 PM, Tom Sparks wrote: >> I am wondering could gnunet run over a dtn (Delay-tolerant network)[1]? >> >> ps: I am still reading though the publications >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay-tolerant_networking >> > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > -- tom sparks x86? We ain't got no x86. We don't need no stinking x86! _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
