On 04/14/15 21:55, demos wrote: > Hi Christian and folks, > > Wow that was a quick answer. > Thank you!;) > At the encryption part: > With "With" i meant the cipher you use. > I can remember Bart said it was a combination of two ciphers.
Well, we use a few things, depending on context. AES+TwoFish is what Bart probably referred to. We also have EdDSA, ECDSA, ECDHE (all Curve25519), and Paillier for homomorphic encryption in special applications... > Concerning the support of openwrt: > What do you think about the idea of crosschecking certain parts of code > for bugs (those parts that directly interact with one another?) together > with the Openwrt-developers. (I haven't asked them yet. Maybe it's > better if you ask them directly?) Well, our code largely just calls the TUN/TAP APIs of the Kernel right now, so I don't know where we'd there touch with OpenWRT-logic. > In my opinion this would be a win-win situation for both, > because you both have experienced C developers. > They get their code reviewed, you get your code reviewed. I'm not sure this is terribly realistic: it takes quite some time to be familiar with the codebase (and you can't review code without understanding what it is supposed to do). That knowledge doesn't translate to a different project easily, you have the initial steep learning curve each time. So it doesn't quite sound like a win-win. However, if the OpenWRT folks are interested in helping Bart (& Florian) get GNUnet onto the WRT platform, that would be great and might be an actual win-win (we gain a platform, they a capability). Happy hacking! Christian _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
