Hi carlo! On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:53:42PM +0100, carlo von lynX wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote: > > Why are you specifying it to HTTP-based at all? > > Are all browsers able to use localhost bus solutions and sockets? > > > I believe a *re-usable* JSON-RPC, which could either be accessed via > > HTTP but just as well using a local socket or existing message-passing > > systems like ubus, dbus, ... would be better and avoid duplicate work. > > Great. We already have an extensive jspsyc library that we used in > the psyczilla add-on for mozilla. It uses native sockets.
That's the kinda stuff I was thinking of. JSON is useful beyond HTTP. > > > Generally sounds great, but as PSYC is real-time only, what if the > > Huh! Where did you read that? Would I suggest to use PSYC as a mail > system if this was true? I suppose not ;) And that made me wonder... > > > node on the other side is currently offline? Eg. I generally like > > to have everything turned-off while I'm sleeping, safe energy and > > bandwidth in hours where it obviously can only harm (ie. disturb > > my sleep with blinkenlights or harddrive noises). However, people > > do send emails to me while I'm sleeping and I do appreciate to > > receive them (once I'm awake). Correct me if I'm missing something, but > > to me it seems as this cannot be achieved with PSYC, right? > > The question is answered on http://secushare.org/architecture > The answer is, yes. PSYC can. Maybe I just remember it worngly, but the last time I touched PSYC, messages were either delivered right away or lost. Logging-in after a connection failure would not show me the history of messages I had missed, but rather just what ever happened from then on. Anyway, thank you for clarifying that, it sounds even better now :) Cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
