Christian Grothoff <groth...@gnunet.org> writes: > On 01/17/2016 05:28 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just built gnunet-gtk 0.10.1 with GNU Guix and noticed some problems. >> >> When running "gnunet-gtk" all I see is five big icons that I can click, >> but nothing else. There seems to be something missing. > > Hmm. 'gnunet-gtk' tries to internally start gnunet-fs-gtk, > gnunet-peerinfo-gtk, gnunet-statistics-gtk and other processes. If those > are somehow not installed/found, that would explain why 'gnunet-gtk' > looks as it does for you. > > So first thing to check is to see if those are built/installed properly > (they should all also run standalone). > >> “gnunet-setup” segfaults when I switch tabs after first clicking on the >> empty URL dropdown in the “General” tab. > > Hmm. That shouldn't be empty in the first place, but this is also a > rather ancient (2 yo) version. I thought Andreas had packaged a much > more recent SVN version for GNU Guix. We have not had an URL dropdown in > the "General" tab for a while now... > > Oh, wait. Maybe gnunet-gtk 0.10.1 was packaged against GNUnet (main) > from SVN HEAD? That could cause all kinds of new and > interesting fun.
Are you refering to the tarball 0.10.1 of gnunet and gnunet-gtk or are you refering to the package used on Guix's side? I try to dig into the buggy package I delivered with gnunet-gtk, and what I see is that gnunet-0.10.1 is used as well as the 0.10.1 I packaged for gnunet-gtk. For testing purposes I need gnunet lastest svn checkout anyhow, so a more recent version of gnunet will folow. >> These are the only >> gnunet-related executables I have run so far. I have not configured >> anything else. >> >> I passed these configure flags: >> >> "--without-libunique", "--with-qrencode" >> >> At build time the following packages are available: >> >> gnunet 0.10.1 >> libgcrypt 1.6.3 >> gtk+ 3.18.2 >> libextractor 1.3 >> glade 3.18.3 >> libglade 2.6.4 >> qrencode 3.4.3 >> pkg-config 0.28 >> >> I’m afraid I cannot provide debug information at the moment. From my previous packaging at gentoo, I have some more flags to pass to gnunet-gtk, fingers crossed to get this thing going and if still failing I can provide more debug info. > Sure, no need. 0.10.1 is old. But the real question is what the > specific repository version is? > > What do you get for > > $ gnunet-arm -v gnunet-arm v0.10.1 release > vs. > > $ gnunet-gtk -v I just installed gnunet-gtk: gnunet-gtk v0.10.1 release > Ideally, they should show the same number (i.e. I get > gnunet-arm v0.10.1 svn-r36683M and gnunet-gtk v0.10.1 svn-r36683M). So, yes they are. The issue might be at some other point I tried to point out in another email I send. > I hope this helps a bit! > > Christian thanks, -- ng irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/~NiAsterisk https://psyced.org:34443/NiAsterisk/ EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers