Christian Grothoff <[email protected]> writes: > On 04/10/2016 08:57 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote: >>> Well, 'bootstrap' is only needed if/when building from Subversion. Once >>> there is a release, this is no longer required. >> >> I have talked with lynX, and also gnunet devs afterwards, and >> I'll fix packages to svn numbers now as users will get a better >> impression with current release other than 0.10.1. When the next >> release candidate comes out I can include it in gentoo, but there >> shouldn't be much difference between release candidate and the >> time it was released (svn-number), or am I wrong? > > Correct, so far at the time of the release, the release always matched > exactly some SVN HEAD revision. > >> My personal experience of 0.10.1 vs 37011 and checkouts before >> that was drastically different, 0.10.1 has problems which are no >> longer existent in later numbers. > > Yeah, about 300 or so according to the bugtracker ;-). > >> I'll call SVN number 37011 gnunet-{gtk-}0.10.2_rc2 in gentoo. >> Maybe i can communicate the same with guix, we'll see. if I can't >> i'll still manage to express it somewhere. > > That should be fine.
Sourcing from what I wrote here[1], I'd like to get some input on this part, where context can be gained through reading the comment on b.g.org: "I could also ask others in the gnunet project if they'd be willing to provide svn snapshot releases of certain branches/projects every n days/weeks" Is this realistic, and if yes/no may I relay your reply to bugs.gentoo.org? This is something I suggested, the first suggestion of gentoo developer wraeth was to suggest either manual captures saved on my infrastructure or (preferable I assume) on gentoo infrastructure. [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579580#c19 thanks, -- ng0 _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
