On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 13:41 +0100, Daniel Golle wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 09:49:52AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > > as Kathy mentioned as first answer to Daniel, a proper setup > > > running > > > > GNUnet on our boards could give us a boost in the IoT world. > > > > It won't boost anything because GNUnet is broken and unusable. > > Please stop > > How did you get to this conclusion? > To me, after having looked at and used all available P2P overlay > networks I could find, GNUnet is still the most advanced (in terms of > security and privacy) and most reliable thing I could find. (and I've > tried cjdns, tinc, n2n and of course tor) > I'm currently using gnunet-vpn to traverse NAT/firewalls for remote > access and management without the need for any central service and > thus > single point of failure. Using GNS identities to manage access > control > is quite straight forward and I'm not aware of any alternative > approach > which could potentially meet the same goals.
Same here. GNS+VPN is great for replacing dyndns+open router ports. > > > > following buzzwords and fads, fix GNUnet and make it usable before > > bringing > > more bugs to the already bug-ridden IoT. > > Having actual users of long-existing low-level features (overlay vpn > with cryptographic identifiers) brings in a lot of testing without > adding new requirements. Making low-bandwidth applications which do > not require any database backend work first also seems like a very > good approach to me -- once that's well-tested in diverse > environments > (think: different home networks with their NAT routers, mobile ISPs > with awkward traffic policies, ...) we can proceed more easily and > have more complex and demanding applications on top (such as > file-sharing or real-time video conferencing). > > > Cheers > > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
