On 02/18/2017 04:45 PM, Christian Grothoff wrote: > I think it would be ideal if we didn't just "have" the domains, but if > we had someone running an FCFS (or other policy) registration service > for GNS there, and possibly a dns2gns bridge, as you envisioned. So if > we had volunteers that could envision doing so in the future, I'd say > that's a good reason to retain the domains. So anyone here who has > plans of becoming a public service registrar for the GNU Name System? >
If you need such a service, then GNUnet e.V. should take the domains. Whoever is going to run the service should be technical contact, not registrant nor administrative contact. I.e., asking to volunteers to take charge of the domains is a bit abusive, as they're already giving their attention. That said, throwing money at DNS rent might not be the best option to support a post-DNS project :) == hk _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
