Thanks for that information, I've not heard much about else about it. On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Jeff Burdges <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I asked around about Solid since it sounded like some semantic web > retread. We should not expect anything useful from them. > > It's apparently some perfect storm of web developers doing cryptography > really badly, while ignoring warnings about trivial things like no > reusing signing keys for encryption. > > Worse, the W3C is now doing nasty DRM shit (EME) in part because they > wasted so much money on Solid. > > > I think Matrix is broadly considered promising, but afaik they cannot do > anything high latency, so metadata leakage galore. > > Jeff > > > > > On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 14:40 +0000, ng0 wrote: > > I've just read this wired article on Tim Berners-Lee new project: > > https://www.wired.com/2017/04/tim-berners-lee-inventor-web- > plots-radical-overhaul-creation/ > > > > Okay, it's a field where there has been always competition. I > > suspect that Tim hasn't talked to any of you or other > > projects working on distributed networks. > > For the curious ones, it sits completely at github: > > https://github.com/solid/ > > > > Shared knowledge would prevent reinventing the wheel a thousand times > > over and over again. > > > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers > >
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
