Christian Grothoff transcribed 29K bytes: > On 09/14/2017 02:41 PM, ng0 wrote: > > Hi Christian and LRN. > > > > I'm going through `gnunet-guile` at the moment > > to understand and improve it. > > I just found this comment in it (with context): > > > > ``` > > (define metadata-type-alist > > '((#:filename . 2) > > (#:publication-date . 24) > > (#:unknown . 45) > > (#:original-filename . 180) > > ;; temporary until the right meta-type is added to libextractor > > (#:narinfo . 230))) > > > > ``` > > > > Read gnu/gnunet/container/metadata.scm in 'gnunet-guile' > > on our git server if you need more context. > > > > This is work mainly from GSoC 2015. > > Has a meta-type (?) for narinfo been added to > > libextractor since then? > > If not, what's needed to get it in? > > Well, it's an enum value, so first a trivial patch to extractor.h, plus > a human-readable textual description in src/main/extractor_metatypes.c > of what "narinfo" is about.
Okay, thanks. I'll see what I can come up with as soon as I can work on it. > I'm confused by the choice of 230, the next > free value is 229, and we should not leave holes. So unless > compatibility is an issue, the value should probably be changed to 229. As far as I could see, and given that this application (gnunet-guile) is currently not in use anywhere there's no compability to consider. I changed it to 229. -- ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://krosos.org/dist/keys/ https://www.infotropique.org https://www.krosos.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
