Hi Phil and Martin,
I know license is often an afterthought, but I searched around the repo and
with my experience in packaging software in a project where licenses are
pointed out precisely, I know that 'MIT' is too vague.
Depending on person and project there's a different understanding of 'MIT
License'
and as you do not have a license file in the repository.
Could you please add a license file ("COPYING" or "LICENSE") to clarify the kind
of 'MIT' license that is used?
Thanks and happy hacking
_______________________________________________
GNUnet-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
