On 06/28/2018 04:13 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote: > link in line 1 returns: > > package: gnunet > doc-category: Internet > doc-summary: Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework > doc-url: http://gnunet.org/book > gplv3-status: depends-on-mysql (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48)
Should be corrected to AGPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > activity-status: ok 201404008 (0.10.1, java-0.10.1, gtk-0.10.1, > fuse-0.10.0/20131222) > > package: libextractor > logo: /software/libextractor/extractor_logo.png > doc-category: Audio > doc-summary: Library to extract meta-data from media files > doc-url: htmlxref > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48) Should be corrected to GPLv3+. (or 'yes'). > activity-status: stale 20131223 (1.3) > > package: libmicrohttpd > copyright-holder: notfsf > language: c > doc-category: Libraries > doc-summary: C library implementing an HTTP 1.1 server > doc-url: /software/libmicrohttpd/manual/ > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet-lgplv2.1+ Should be LGPLv3+. > For 1 I propose to correct the doc-url entry, we already have a first > initial state of https://docs.gnunet.org publicly accessible. Sure. > license status does only reflect the latest release (maybe its intended > to be that way?). No, it's just way outdated. > libextractor is not stale in development. And had more recent releases. > lmhd had more recent releases I think. Yes, 0.9.59 by now. > For 2: Let us rewrite the text. I've seen that you were active at the new > website with a small fitting description, and we should sync that. The > current package description was adjusted by myself at some point in the > last couple of years. Well, that sounds like you know _how_ to do this, so please do! :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
