As discussed on our IRC channel, it seems as if I misinterpreted the commit message which made me contact you.
The systemd file was apparently just adjusted by one line, the original file was a file someone of us wrote. Since I am convinced we have a threshold of originality situation here (there are only so many ways to write a systemd service). Unless you have a different view within a reasonable amount of time for volunteers, I will place the systemd file in the public domain (or rather ask xrs to do so, if it seems reasonable to xrs). On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:04:28 +0100 (CET), <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi maintainers and contributors to the gnunet-git package in Archlinux (CC'd), > > we recently included a systemd service file based on (read: at the moment 1:1 > the same, > with an added comment of origin) your systemd service file in the gnunet-git > branch > of the AUR repository. > > Since neither Archlinux nor AUR provide a clear licensing statement, and we > like to be > on the safe side, I have 2 questions: > > 1. Of those CC'd in the email who touched the .service file in question, > do you give us permission to include and modify the file? > 2. Out of curiosity and for future references: What is the license on the AUR > git repository > and the Archlinux packages git repository? No clear indication means as > far as I am > concerned that it is the default license for most legal domains (all > rights reserved). > We'd have to consider the threshold of originality though. > > > Cheers, > ng0 for GNUnet > _______________________________________________ > GNUnet-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
