Am 28.01.19 um 13:40 schrieb Schanzenbach, Martin: > My angle would be that managing gitlab instead of BB+mantis+gitolite is: > 1. Less maintenance overhead (A single solution) > 2. Better integration (see above) > 3. Better overall quality and appearance (subjectively)
I strongly support moving to an integrated system like gitlab. While Martin already mentioned many reasons, I want to add one: * Attracting more developers The current setup requires three(?) accounts, learning new systems (mantis, BB), adopting to a new workflow. learning where to find what, etc. Additionally Matis is just old-fashined and uncomfortable to use. This will distract new developers. And those who are conviced will spend time in learning this setup instead of contributing to the project. Oh, cool NOT: When clicking on "Development Corner -> Bucktracking" I get "blocked by CSP" from the embedded frame :-) -- Schönen Gruß Hartmut Goebel Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP, ISO 27001 Lead Implementer Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure Software Development Goebel Consult, Landshut http://www.goebel-consult.de Blog: https://www.goe-con.de/blog/das-fass-ist-voll-grunde-linux-201asystemd2018-zu-meiden Kolumne: https://www.goe-con.de/hartmut-goebel/cissp-gefluester/2010-08-scheingefechte-um-rim
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
