On 3/16/19 2:34 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Would anyone else involved in the decision and administration process > be okay with a branch where anyone could push to? > My idea is like this, at least the general principle of it: > https://repo.or.cz/mob.html > Since we require the CAA we could then pick patches from > this branch and merge them into the official branch. > > Iff we change to Gitlab I'm not sure if this would still be possible > or even necessary. > > My idea is that instead of "send a patch" we have another > option for people to send patches - send to a remote we > can pick a patch from. > > As git admin my vote would be on yes, trying it. But I don't want > to make decisions without further feedback by other people > involved in that group.
In principle, I like the idea. However, I'm afraid the lawyers won't. Without a reasonably consistent application of the CA policy, it is likely that we'll get into trouble with some lawyer at some point. And obviously a mob branch from which patches _never_ get merged for lack of CA is not so useful. So I'd rather keep the barrier to Git write access very low -- filing out the CA form is not really asking that much I hope. But again, this is me wearing purely the "legal" hat. If I could first change global copyright laws to my liking, my opinion on this would be very different ;-p _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
