Hi t3ss, Well, what the old '-t' option showed wasn't really useful for current CADET, and it wasn't obvious to me what we would want to show that wasn't covered by the '-P', '-p' and '-T' options post #5385. Furthermore, there is the major issue of identifying a specific 'tunnel'. So right now, the '-p' option covers (most of?) this, and usually I would say that if there were more information to be returned, it could probably be included in the existing -pPT option family.
That said, if you have some information to be returned that is not easily covered by extending -pPT, I'm not against re-introducing '-t'. It just didn't seem to serve any useful purpose anymore. Happy hacking! Christian On 3/20/19 7:15 AM, t3sserakt wrote: > Hey Christian, > > > after the fix of #5385 gnunet-cadet had no "-t" option anymore to show > info about a specific tunnel. why that? > Do we "only" need to reimplement this option with the asynchronous API > that was introduced with #5385? > > > Cheers > > > t3ss >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
