On 4/7/19 6:46 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote: > The CAA does not help in any way. You are still liable as a platform. It has > literally nothing to do with the copyright infringements if the contributor > copied code from somewhere else. You cannot delegate this responsibility > anymore to the user. That way the old way of doing it.
I am not sure what requirements you are talking about. Do you have some reference that explains this? Christian, do you have one? I would guess we are probably not the only project affected by this. It sounds like you're suggesting that we should have a core team of developers in official capacity for GNUnet e.V. to look at pull requests and then say "we think that this doesn't infringe on copyright" and merge them in. Is that what you're saying? If somebody hosts code on the GNUnet gitlab that infringes copyright, wouldn't we also be responsible for this? How does the pull request policy solve that? > Just do whatever you want. I think I will stop bringing myself in this regard > and just develop in an external mirror repo occasionally rebasing my stuff in > the main repo. This way, you can even keep gitolite -> win win I thought we were having an interesting discussion here. You're right, nobody is forcing you to commit to master regularly. That's fine, everybody should use a workflow they're comfortable with. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
