On 4/20/19 4:03 PM, t3sserakt wrote: >>> I am especially interested in the work regarding TNG. I also would like >>> to hear more about TNG before the GNUnet Hacker Meeting. In the past >>> there was a more or less regular GNUnet dev mumble meeting. Maybe we >>> could have one where we get an introduction into TNG. As preparation for >>> such a mumble meeting I would start to look into the actual transport code. >> That's a good idea, a good day for me for such a Mumble would be May 1st. > > On bank holiday I am usually spending time with my family. If it is at > the beginning or end of the day I can make it, but not during the day.
We can certainly do it late, say 9pm? >> Best preparation would probably reading up on NAT traversal and >> fingerprinting attacks on TLS. The IETF QUIC draft also seems like it >> has quite a few interesting ideas in it, I haven't fully digested it >> myself, but for someone looking to contribute on topics like traffic >> amplification and congestion control, that draft likely has some ideas >> we'll want to eventually take into consideration. > > All documents in here > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/quic/documents/ > > or specific ones? Specific ones: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-transport/ and maybe https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-recovery/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
