On 3/21/20 5:02 PM, Alessio Vanni wrote: > Admittedly, my patch was a simple copy&paste of some code earlier in the > file. A better approach would likely be to implicitly assing the value > "forever" when the '-e' option is missing, instead of generating an > error. What do you think?
I think it's better to generate an error, as we really cannot say that 'forever' is actually desired.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
