On 8/25/20 1:33 AM, TheJackiMonster wrote: > I was just thinking if I should make it an actual GNUNET service and > working out how to handle multiple applications using the library at > once with separate egos. (This would also ease testing.) Do you think > this would make sense?
Yes, that would certainly make sense and fit the architecture of the overall system. Also: if you can find a way to replace the ring topology with (ideally) a KAD-like topology (log n links to peers at XOR distances), you should become much more robust against network failures, peer failures or malicious peers *and* might even get good synergies in terms of CORE-level connections with the DHT (that's why I'm susgesting KAD-like). That said, going from ring to KAD should probably be a v2 feature -- just putting it out there now ;-). Happy hacking! Christian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
