On 4/14/21 10:22 AM, William Liquorice wrote: > > One issue that I have found myself unable to solve is the FAQ about > distributed ledger technologies, because the question only sort-of makes > sense for the given answer. Seems like the question is asking about > whether, but the answer seems to focus more on using distributed ledgers > in GNUnet. Should I open an issue on the bug tracker for it?
Hmm. What do people think about a more radical formulation, like instead of: >>>> Is GNUnet build using distributed ledger technologies? A: No. GNUnet is a new network protocol stack for building secure, distributed, and privacy-preserving applications. While a ledger could be built using GNUnet, we currently have no plans in doing so. <<<< we could write >>>> Is GNUnet build using distributed ledger technologies? A: No. GNUnet is a new network protocol stack for building secure, distributed, and privacy-preserving applications. While a ledger could be built using GNUnet, we currently see no utility from doing so. <<<< WDYT? Is that better / clearer? -Christian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
