Okay; That's this missing part. Thanks! Regards, Sascha
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Shaw > Sent: Sonntag, 5. Juni 2005 01:01 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing > > > On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:42:51AM +0200, Kiefer, Sascha wrote: > > Hmm. > > I just implemented RFC2015 3 days ago. > > The format of PGP/MIME described in that paper does not match the > > format you are using. Your mails start with a Content-Type of > > multipart/mixed and you declare The pgp data as > attachments. But this > > is not true. Maybe I'm missing something, or your messages not > > pgp/smime encoded? I attached your mails (one signed, one > encrypted) > > to this mail, so you can check to see what i mean. > > Possibly the confusion is that RFC-2015 was updated by > RFC-3156. You should do things the 3156 way. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
