On Tuesday 21 June 2005 9:48 am, Alphax wrote: > Fortunately, I have a "clean" copy of this key
as does subkeys.pgp.net - it was retrieved automatically and without spurious signatures or errors. > - it > has about 3 sigs on it, gpg --list-sigs 0xF874C613 pub 1024D/F874C613 2005-04-28 uid Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig 97394664 2005-05-23 [User ID not found] sig 3 F874C613 2005-04-29 Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig 1 P C521097E 2005-05-05 [User ID not found] sig 1 P 9C851DF1 2005-05-05 [User ID not found] uid Andrew Cranwell (Alphax) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig 97394664 2005-05-23 [User ID not found] sig 3 F874C613 2005-04-28 Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig 1 P C521097E 2005-05-05 [User ID not found] uid Andrew Cranwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig 97394664 2005-05-23 [User ID not found] sig 3 F874C613 2005-04-29 Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig 1 P C521097E 2005-05-05 [User ID not found] sub 2048g/51E09049 2005-04-28 sig F874C613 2005-04-28 Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > as opposed to the current 500+. Delete the key from your keyring, retrieve it from subkeys.pgp.net and change your keyserver preference. > Actually, I'd be > interested to hear who has a non-corrupt copy of this key, and how many > sigs are on it (please make public, so we can all share it!). > > Oh, and why does this list not automagically set the Reply-to header? Because it's sensible and uses decent headers like List-Id. :-) -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpsUTuj9gfFI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
