On Tuesday 21 June 2005 6:38 pm, Jason Harris wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:04:38AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 June 2005 9:48 am, Alphax wrote: > > > Fortunately, I have a "clean" copy of this key > > > > as does subkeys.pgp.net - it was retrieved automatically and without > > spurious signatures or errors. > > Neil, you must have hit keyserver.kjsl.com; the rest of the servers > in subkeys.pgp.net are SKS (1.0.9) and don't (yet) filter these bogus > packets.
It wasn't a keyserver issue, I was under the impression the problem was the key being used to sign the messages: 0xF874C613 whereas you are looking at 0xCA57AD7C. > %gpg --check-sigs CA57AD7C > 458 signatures not checked due to missing keys -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpzjljT5xHcU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
