On Friday 17 February 2006 04:44, David Shaw wrote: > * Added support for signing subkey "back signatures". Requiring > back signatures to be present is currently off by default, but > will be changed to on by default in the future, once more keys > contain the back signature. A new "backsign" command in the > --edit-key menu can be used to update signing subkeys with back > signatures.
Is the backsign command of 1.4.3rc1 stable enough to provide existing keys with a back signature? Are there any PGP implementations that have problems with keys containing such a signature? Thanx Malte
pgpXmsJnNVFzh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
