On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 04:18:17PM +0100, Malte Gell wrote: > On Friday 17 February 2006 04:44, David Shaw wrote: > > > * Added support for signing subkey "back signatures". Requiring > > back signatures to be present is currently off by default, but > > will be changed to on by default in the future, once more keys > > contain the back signature. A new "backsign" command in the > > --edit-key menu can be used to update signing subkeys with back > > signatures. > > Is the backsign command of 1.4.3rc1 stable enough to provide existing > keys with a back signature?
Yes. > Are there any PGP implementations that have problems with keys > containing such a signature? I don't know of one. Any PGP program that doesn't ignore unknown noncritical signature subpackets would be pretty broken. David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
