On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:07:48AM +0100, Walter Haidinger wrote: > > Potentially dangerous. How sensitive is this password? > > Is a mode 600 file secure for your usage? > > Yes, I'd think so. After all, we're talking about protecting > a keystore of _public_ keys... > > If GnuPG could also store secret keys (btw, can it? have never checked)
It's theoretically possible, but no keyserver works that way. > on LDAP, this might be different story. However, at least for now, > being as secure as pam_ldap _is_ sufficient, IMHO. Okay, I buy this. I'll add binddn and bindpw to gpgkeys_ldap for the next release. David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
