-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 05/12/2006 08:22 PM, I wrote: [..snip..] > I simply don't understand. Why list-packets reports these spurios(?) > certification signature packets(they must be cross certifications since > 39795DA7 is a signing subkey) This hypothesis has been made on a dated version of OpenPGP standard, RFC2440bis-draft16 states: > 0x19 Primary Key Binding Signature > This signature is a statement by a signing subkey, indicating > that it is owned by the primary key and subkey. This signature > is calculated the same way as a 0x18 signature: directly on the > primary key and subkey, and not on any User ID or other packets. OK, these misterious packets are surely cross certifications. They are obviously non existent, since there is no reason for their presence in a public key encrypted message. - --
Q.E.D. ICQ UIN: 301825501 OpenPGP key ID: 0x58D14EB3 Key fingerprint: 00B9 3E17 630F F2A7 FF96 DA6B AEE0 EC27 58D1 4EB3 Check fingerprints before trusting a key! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEZkW5H+Dh0Dl5XacRA6PeAJ0Y0H3NfLGLs7yXOsTtG3PqIrrbbwCeMc+s nnzfX0qvwK1Szo0eRLxSsYk= =E5YV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
