-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 08/29/2006 05:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..snip..] >> This is a rather strange statement. >> Other organizations should have their OWN pubkeys to which documents >> sent to them are encrypted. > Good Point. I wasn't thinking of that. So for outbound documents, the > only issue that could exist would be verifying our signature if we are > signing the document? Right.
> Or is the signature part of the master key and > wouldn't be impacted by adding an additional subkey? If signing subkeys are not present you have only to worry about the expiration date on the master key. - -- Q.E.D. War is Peace Freedom is Slavery Ignorance is Strength ICQ UIN: 301825501 OpenPGP key ID: 0x58D14EB3 Key fingerprint: 00B9 3E17 630F F2A7 FF96 DA6B AEE0 EC27 58D1 4EB3 Check fingerprints before trusting a key! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE9GaQH+Dh0Dl5XacRA4jQAJ9XjRyh4KX3b4QmIJQFZBjlFitgAwCfTdil /i1p2iXIj9yKWKAWOtInxKI= =nI/R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
