On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:21:20PM -0500, Andrew Myers wrote: > Hi all, > > CIVS originally sent text/plain emails. But it was useful to be able to > embed links and to preserve election description formatting. The HTML it > sends is pretty minimal -- I don't think it should set off reasonable > spam filters.
It certainly was enough to make my brain register it as unreadable, I only went back to it when Warner mentioned the deadline again. Looking at it now I agree it is rather minimal as far as html goes, but it's still not something I'd willingly read as email (had to spawn a browser to look at it). > At least, I haven't heard this complaint before. Making > HTML mail an option seems like a good idea, though there are already too > many options for my taste. If someone wants to write that patch I'd be > happy to include it. I had a look at the code, but unfortunately I'm not much of a perl coder. I'm sure there others on this list who can do a better job than I can. > I hope the election system has been working well for everyone otherwise. The system was fairly easy to use, the hardest part was deciding how the various entries ranked :) Wouter van Heyst
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
