On Monday 02 April 2007 17:34, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > No, you're misunderstanding me. I'm not concerned with the > > technical user who posts a question to a news list and understands > > the issue. I'm wondering about the non-technical (business) user > > who gets a plug-in for his email client and then misinterprets a > > modified signature block that someone tampered with. > > Proper MUAs clearly mark the signed part(s) of a message. For > instance, checkout KMail (or Gnus).
Moreover, at least in KMail the comment and version headers are not even shown to the user. So there's no way the user could be lead into thinking they belonged to the signed text/data. Regards, Ingo
pgpBq2e1YUse4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
