On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> When my university was using SpamAssassin, GPG emails were being
> marked as spam because patterns were being matched by the armored text
> and no negative bonus was being given to GPG signed or encrypted
> messages. They were not willing to tweak their rules.
Has anyone tried contacting the SA developers about this? It seems like
something fairly straightforward for them to add.
Doug
--
If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
