On Nov 19, 2007 12:30 PM, Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> BTW, it would make thing much easier if the pacthes are creasted with > description. You are correct... I started maintaining since 1.9... So these are older... I will try my best to determine what happened back then. > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-crypt/gnupg/files/gnupg-1.4.3-keyserver.patch?rev=1.1 > > I can't see for what this patch is good for: Agreed. > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-crypt/gnupg/files/gnupg-1.4.3-selftest.patch?rev=1.1 > > - echo "../g10/gpg --no-options --no-greeting \ > + echo "../g10/gpg --no-options --no-greeting --homedir . \ > --no-secmem-warning --batch --dearmor" >>./gpg_dearmor > chmod 755 ./gpg_dearmor > + if test ! -f ./pubring.gpg; then touch -t 197001020000 ./pubring.gpg; > fi > + if test ! -f ./secring.gpg; then touch -t 197001020000 ./secring.gpg; > fi > > Please explain. Will test again... But as it seems there was a problem in using the homedir of package management user... > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-crypt/gnupg/files/gnupg-1.4.6-badruman.patch?rev=1.1 > > I can't see any problem with gpg.ru. Will try. > > There was also an issue with PIC: > > sed -i -e 's:PIC:__PIC__:' mpi/i386/mpih-{add,sub}1.S intl/relocatable.c > > sed -i -e 's:if PIC:ifdef __PIC__:' mpi/sparc32v8/mpih-mul{1,2}.S > > Please send a more detailed bug report. As far as I tested, gcc defines __PIC__ when you use -fPIC not PIC. Does it different at your side? Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
