On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:09 AM, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some people include a policy URL in the certification to tell a > recipient just what was done. This has its own advantages and > disadvantages, but is really a comment as well, as no program parses > and acts on the information. 5.2.3.13. and 5.2.3.20. of RFC 4880 look very promising. Even if no one else cares about them, I will probably try and implement them. > The bottom line is that you can sign with a signature level if you > like, but (barring persona signatures) it only makes a marginal > difference in practice. While that is a problem, you can do your best to make the local situation the best you can possibly make it. Richard _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
