-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Well, 10 years ago, probably there was just a single variety of GnuPG (g10)...
- --
Hideki Saito

| On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
|
|> GnuPG 2.x introduces a lot of new crypto support that is not related to
|> OpenPGP.  The original metonymy is no longer appropriate.
|
| Well, PGP also has support for X.509 and a lot more.
|
| It is funny that the naming issue is such a hot topic.  We had a similar
| thread 10 years ago when I asked for a name of GnuPG (at that time
| called g10).
|
|
|
| Salam-Shalom,
|
|    Werner
|
|

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkgVnNoACgkQsMFNnAQed4yZXQCfQthgJdctm7l0o4GsNkI1bFmX
BfEAnAsGjl6vfu4SUo7R4BUNt2cBZX0B
=E35g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to