Yes i made a bit of a mess when first setting up my account. The two revoked keys are ones i got confused with and wanted to start from scratch. The one that isnt revoked is my good key that i am using now.
9DA5B32F is my key that i will be using from now on. Thanks for the reply guys, Simon Dwyer On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 05:01 -0400, Charly Avital wrote: > Faramir wrote the following on 6/10/08 12:17 AM: > [...] > > > And that is the > > reason to use "key pairs", because a singe key can't do both functions. > > The above statement is not accurate. > > A careful reading of <http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#INTRO> is > recommended. > > This is the Spanish version: <http://www.gnupg.org/gph/es/manual.html> > > Attention Simon Dwyer. The following keys were found on a key server: > (1) Simon Luke Dwyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Simon Luke Dwyer (Technology Services Group) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1024 bit DSA key 9DA5B32F, created: 2008-06-09 > (2) Simon Dwyer (SpYkEs) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1024 bit DSA key 9D826360, created: 2008-06-09 (revoked) > (3) Simon Luke Dwyer (SpYkEs) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1024 bit DSA key 41494BDE, created: 2008-06-06 (revoked) > Can you please confirm that key No. 1 '1024 bit DSA key 9DA5B32F, > created: 2008-06-09' is the one you are or will be using, since the > other two have been revoked. Thanks in advance. > > Charly > > > > [...] > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
