-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 michael graffam schrieb: > Not a real solution, because if LD_PRELOAD is already set, then the > shell you type unset into might be overloaded as we'll, already.
Now that's very true; but still my opinion is that if you can't trust the system on which you're working, I wouldn't dare to use gnupg anyway. Sure, you could link everything statically to gnupg, but that'd make maintenance very very hard. For every revision of a dependant lib you'd need adapt code, ship new source, recompile or ship new binaries. Dependancy-hell. Though a smartcard might help there... > Manually walking the environment pointer reveals it, of course. Not exactly sure what you mean there? Alex. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBSFAF0BYlVVSQ3uFxAQJslwP7BF16iyonCXhxH6bLseATu/j54LXrgOtB ruBkamEHCdZUVTeXiq5W9SsFOEAbuXaEgtmV/mRsvtOM1doT9syQqx8+Y75BLja9 KFs++aDIx0mx6l01oacxTk8lJf59p9KiFvB+a6TQcWbbMnX1GCCkxj4u9OrByk+A BHGGI3tb9Q4= =RMFQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
