On Aug 29, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Faramir wrote:
Same here... By the way, I still don't understand the benefit from
GPG2...
Principally, two things:
* The architecture has been redone to make it easier to maintain
* The introduction of S/MIME support
These are the two claims Werner, David and others have made re: GnuPG
2.x. I have not yet verified either; I have no need for GnuPG's S/
MIME,
and I haven't taken a good look at the code.
This isn't quite right - I haven't been very involved in GPG 2-
specific stuff (S/MIME, the assuan stuff, etc). I've been very
involved in GPG in general, of course, but my work with OpenPGP tends
to apply to both 1 and 2. GPG 1 scratches my particular itch, so I
usually run that rather than the larger GPG 2.
David
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
