-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Another Pondering as every year need bigger bit sized keys to be secure Benefits and Cons Wondering if adding a bigger encryption/signing sub keys to current key on keyserver leaves the benefit keeping the same finger print? So don't have inform all your corresondences to get a new key from you? They just have --refresh their public keyrings Over Just setting old key to expire and Generate a new set, collect signatures again, change info on web pages and/or bussiness cards? - -- Werewolf ======================================= http://spandex31095.tripod.com/ Skype: Werewolf6851 ===== Instant Messenger Accounts ====== Yahoo: lover_of_lycra ICQ: 304325894 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: LycraloverWolf ======================================= GPG key 76E6C1BC with following fingerprint D508 2C9D B3A9 2F0E E472 95A8 2D8C B9E6 76E6 C1BC ======================================= Inara: "What should I do?" Simon: (hands her bandages): "Tie it off." Inara: "Simon, I'm good with anatomy, but not like this..." --Unfilmed Episode, "Dead or Alive" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Portable Thunderbird version 2.0.0.17 (20080914) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkj3ubIACgkQLYy55nbmwbxmAgCdETbweCy8Yz4ST+r6peRJPnqD EHUAoMtPtPKg3ntgrPxvxcVfiAdwCRER =i70a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
