Doug Barton wrote: > The AF's conclusion seems obvious, however it ignores a critical > factor of the Navy's use case.
The story is apocryphal, so it doesn't make much sense to talk about the motives of the people involved -- it's fiction. But even were it true, I'd be hard-pressed to agree that it shows ignorance on the part of the AF engineers. It shows the AF engineers and the Navy engineers looked at the same data and drew two completely different conclusions -- and both of them were right. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
