-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I see that there are some people who send their messages (especially to this list) with their messages signed via an attached signature. I can't imagine that this question hasn't been asked before, but is there an advantage to doing this vs having an inline signature?
BTW, I run a mailinglist which strips all attachments. If I use a signature attachment, am I further limiting an already limited audience? TIA - -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAko8FQUACgkQRIVy4fC+NyRPNwCfTw4RIcwpGCU3BKhLbM98sZv/ fTYAniJqtkhQXyOshzwbFU3dO4xQO8qu =NI2H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
