Michel Villeneuve wrote: > Firstly, by "supported" I mean, if it becomes a standard communication > tool, could creation of key process be modified (name, email adress, > comment => name wave adress comment), because I understood that an > email adress cannot be a wave adress. Is there deep technical issus > there or just a matter of vocabulary ?
This is all a ton of cart-before-the-horse. Let me ask a simple question. "If someone enters into the wave, should they be able to read previous traffic?" Some people say yes, some people say no. Some use cases say it's obvious, others say obviously not. It's rash to talk about supporting a particular protocol within Wave before there's a consensus on what behaviors we want. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
