-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 19th 2009 for [email protected]
IMO steganography should be mixed with cryptography to be secure. As example: LSB in pictures (Unless you have a professional camera) will be random (High entropy and no predecible). You can replace it with ciphertext (Undistinguible from random noise) and no one will note the difference. Of course if instead of replace the LSB with direct ciphertext you put an GPG encrypted file the magic numbers will prove than there is an encripted message. It can't be decoded w/o the key but you can be forced to give the key. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAksF/1IACgkQZ4DA0TLic4gcdwCeO4Pj4CNLNDfP3QmLbZFGT4nz zJUAni/BqPbPJEEqJbOTg44EED5McgeK =LFjl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: resent because the first wasn't sent to the mailing list. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
